New York Times: The Centrist Cop-Out, Paul Krugman
Wall Street Journal: House Postpones Vote on Boehner Debt Plan, Naftali Bendavid and Carol E. Lee
Wall Street Journal: Lending Markets Feeling the Strain, Liz Rappaport and Matt Phillips
The ongoing "crisis" over increasing --or not-- the Federal debt ceiling has become unavoidable. It is all over the news; one plan after another has crashed and burned as unable to pass the Congress (House Postpones Vote on Boehner Debt Plan); the stock market is down for its 5th consecutive day; Wall Street's industry association, SIFMA, has been holding conference calls to hammer out the operational nitty-gritty of how to handle a debt default that really should not be happening (Lending Markets Feeling the Strain).
This morning I watched CNBC as Becky Quick hammered Maryland Democratic Representative Steny Hoyer for blaming the other side, and not doing enough to avert the crisis. But in his op-ed today, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman argued that the news media, in its attempt to be even-handed, has neglected to squarely place the blame for the deadlock where it belongs: on the "extremism" of Congressional Republicans. I agree with him. Though all agree that long term deficits and debt--caused largely by health-care and retirement costs and wars-- are out of hand and must be addressed, there is absolutely no reason to link action on this to the short-term operational decision to lift the debt ceiling. Other developed countries do not even have a debt ceiling. It was the decision of Congressional Republicans to use the debt ceiling as a weapon to dismantle social programs which the majority of Americans want and expect. The absolute refusal to allow the expiration of the "temporary" Bush tax breaks on the wealthiest Americans is deeply irresponsible. America already has the greatest gap between rich and poor of any developed country on earth and it has been steadily widening--is this good for our nation? All compromises, including the latest one worked out by Republican House Speaker Boehner, have foundered on the insistence by some to maintain the tax burden on the wealthiest at its lowest level since the 1920's.
I hope this will be resolved. I hope the debt ceiling will be lifted. I hope that both sides will be steadfast in building consensus for an aggressive plan to put the fiscal house in order, with a sensible mix of spending cuts and fair revenue enhancements, which economists agree is the proper course of action. But if the Republican intransigence continues, I have a guess about what will happen. There will be a temporary government shutdown which will be resolved in a matter of days or weeks; we will not default on our debt, but there will be a delay in cutting checks and providing services. Lots of money will be wasted digging out from the mess that the temporary shut-down will cause. And in 2012, tea-party affiliated Congressmen who came in in 2010 with a "mandate" will be swept out just as quickly. Remember Newt Gingrich in the 1990s? It could happen again.
Friday, July 29, 2011
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment