Debt Deal: The Aftermath

from www.whitehouse.gov

Although pendulums swing both ways and there is still plenty of time until the 2012 elections, it seems clear that the debt deal hammered out last week, and the subsequent Standard and Poor's downgrade of the United State's credit rating was a serious political set-back for President Obama.    Here are some memorable words from the press:

Kurt Anderson

Kurt Andersen, New York Times: Of course, a lot of us swooned over Obama partly because he seemed so prudent, straightforward and even-keeled. But now, with Republicans spectacularly applying the Madman Theory for the first time in domestic politics, Obama’s nonconfrontational reasonableness isn’t looking like such a virtue. [brilliant article, compares Obama to Nixon]

Joe Nocera

Joe Nocera, New York Times: I still think it was terribly wrong for the Republicans to use the threat of default to  insist on massive spending cuts, though President Obama also deserves blame for playing his hand so poorly.






Lexington, The Economist: Any assessment of Mr. Obama needs to acknowledge that when he was elected he inherited the in-box from hell.... Now he faces the opposition from hell....But Americans want their Presidents to be winners, not victims.

Peggy Noonan

Peggy Noonan, Wall Street Journal: ...speeches aren't magic.  A speech is only as good as the ideas it advances.  Reagan had good ideas.  Obama does not.

Holman Jenkins

Holman W. Jenkins, Jr., Wall Street Journal: Tax reform is the political fulcrum for addressing the growth shortage, the fiscal crisis, and our runaway health-care prices problem.  It's the one idea that reaches across the partisan divide.  It might be the only thing that can save the Obama presidency. [Good point!]

Debt Ceiling: the Story that Won't Go Away

New York Times: The Centrist Cop-Out, Paul Krugman
Wall Street Journal: House Postpones Vote on Boehner Debt Plan, Naftali Bendavid and Carol E. Lee
Wall Street Journal: Lending Markets Feeling the Strain, Liz Rappaport and Matt Phillips

The ongoing "crisis" over increasing --or not-- the Federal debt ceiling has become unavoidable.  It is all over the news; one plan after another has crashed and burned as unable to pass the Congress (House Postpones Vote on Boehner Debt Plan); the stock market is down for its 5th consecutive day; Wall Street's industry association, SIFMA, has been holding conference calls to hammer out the operational nitty-gritty of how to handle a debt default that really should not be happening (Lending Markets Feeling the Strain).

This morning I watched CNBC as Becky Quick hammered Maryland Democratic Representative Steny Hoyer for blaming the other side, and not doing enough to avert the crisis.  But in his op-ed today, Nobel laureate Paul Krugman argued that the news media, in its attempt to be even-handed, has neglected to squarely place the blame for the deadlock where it belongs: on the "extremism" of Congressional Republicans.  I agree with him.  Though all agree that long term deficits and debt--caused largely by health-care and retirement costs and wars-- are out of hand and must be addressed, there is absolutely no reason to link action on this to the short-term operational decision to lift the debt ceiling.  Other developed countries do not even have a debt ceiling.  It was the decision of Congressional Republicans to use the debt ceiling as a weapon to dismantle social programs which the majority of Americans want and expect.   The absolute refusal to allow the expiration of the "temporary" Bush tax breaks on the wealthiest Americans is deeply irresponsible.  America already has the greatest gap between rich and poor of any developed country on earth and it has been steadily widening--is this good for our nation?   All compromises, including the latest one worked out by Republican House Speaker Boehner, have foundered on the insistence by some to maintain the tax burden on the wealthiest at its lowest level since the 1920's.

I hope this will be resolved.  I hope the debt ceiling will be lifted.  I hope that both sides will be steadfast in building consensus for an aggressive plan to put the fiscal house in order, with a sensible mix of spending cuts and fair revenue enhancements, which economists agree is the proper course of action.  But if the Republican intransigence continues, I have a guess about what will happen.  There will be a temporary government shutdown which will be resolved in a matter of days or weeks; we will not default on our debt, but there will be a delay in cutting checks and providing services.  Lots of money will be wasted digging out from the mess that the temporary shut-down will cause.  And in 2012, tea-party affiliated Congressmen who came in in 2010 with a "mandate" will be swept out just as quickly.  Remember Newt Gingrich in the 1990s?  It could happen again.

US Default: Neon Swans

Last year, as a hedge against inflation I bought a moderate position of 10-year US Treasury Inflation Protected Securities (TIPS). I have watched the value of these securities go up by more than 10% -- not because of 10% inflation, but because of falling interest rates. I feel tempted to sell them to cash in on the unrealized gain. Perhaps gold would be better as an inflation hedge anyway (though I have read there is no clear correlation), and I can be fairly certain that at some point in the next ten years interest rates will creep up again from their absurdly low present levels, and I will lose my 10% gain if I hold the TIPS to maturity as I originally intended.

Now, with the various branches of the government flailing about in so-far fruitless attempts to raise the debt ceiling and avoid default by August 2, I wonder if it might be a good time to sell. On the other hand, no one else seems to be selling -- yields on US Treasuries do not seem to be rising and falling based on political news about the debt ceiling--the market is sanguine, and it almost seems unpatriotic to sell at this point

Jason Zweig's column in today's Wall Street Journal refers to the possibility of a default or downgrade of US Treasury debt as a neon swan: "an event that is unthinkably rare, immensely important and blindingly obvious", riffing on Nassim Taleb's "Black Swan". He remarks that "many investors seem to be coping with what seems like an obvious risk by simply closing their eyes."

This puts me in mind of the temporary Newt Gingrich-led government shut-down of 1995. I was working in the client administration area of a large international financial institution, which was custodian for a good chunk of US Government Debt held by Japanese institutional investors--billions of dollars worth of T/Notes and T/Bonds. At that time, we used to receive a pile of faxes every day from our customers in Tokyo: inquiries on everything from fee bills to 1 penny rounding differences on multi-million dollar settlements. There was virtually nothing on the looming government shut down which was all over the press, and how it would effect them.

I wish I had kept a journal back then.  As I recall, a day finally did come that we did not get paid interest on some Treasury issues (the operations staff had to manually reverse automatic postings that the system had made) I approached the head Japanese relationship manager, and asked him how we would explain this to the customers. He asked me to draft something. I made a brief write-up, explaining that processing of the payments had been delayed because of the government shut-down, which they had probably read about in the newspaper. The fax went out, the payments were made a couple of days late, and we never heard anything more about it.

There are about $14 trillion of US Treasuries outstanding, and foreign countries hold over $4 trillion, of which China and Japan each hold about $1 trillion (see http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/tic/Documents/mfh.txt) . Maybe the market is sanguine because there is so much money involved --the vested interests are so powerful-- that no amount of political in-fighting can change the basic facts. I also suspect that any S&P, Moody's or Fitch downgrade will also be a non-event. Those who hold debt balances in the hundreds of billions will do their own analysis, and make their own decisions, regardless of what a few analysts in an office in Manhattan decide.

Let's hope I'm right.